| |
|
|
| April, 2007 |
DOJ's 6700 "Abusive Tax Shelter" COMPLAINT against
WTP |
|
| |
|
|
| May, 2007 |
WTP's Motion to Dismiss |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Declaration #1 -- Facts regarding WTP's
"Operation Stop Withholding"
Declaration #2 -- Facts establishing OSW is the
exercise of the Right to Petition
Declaration #3 -- Facts regarding IRS's guise of
a "6700" investigation |
|
| |
|
|
| June, 2007 |
DOJ Response & Motion for Summary Judgment
and its
Statement of Material Facts. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Declaration of IRS Agent Nelson
Declaration of IRS Agent Weaver.pdf
Declaration of IRS Agent Gordon.pdf
Declaration of IRS Agent Engel.pdf |
|
| |
|
|
| July, 2007 |
WTP's Opposition to Summary Judgment
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
WTP Response to DOJ Statement of Material Facts Plus Add'l
Material Facts
Declaration #4 -- Cross-reference to key WTP/US
communications
Declaration #5 -- Evidence establishing
"Blue Folder" was not sold
Declaration #6 -- Evidence establishing US
had actual Notice of key documents
(no Declaration #7)
Declaration #8 -- Evidence of key
legislative changes to the tax laws, 1913-1917
Declaration #9 -- Incorporation of
Right-to-Petition arguments from the (DC) RTP
lawsuit
Declaration #10 -- Evidence, research
regarding the "861 argument," Taxable Income
|
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
USDC DECISION & ORDER Granting Summary Judgment & Injunction |
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
WTP Motion for Reconsideration
&
Declaration # 11 |
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
WTP Motion To Stay Injunction
&
Declaration #12 |
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
USDC
DECISION & ORDER Denying Reconsideration & Stay |
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
WTP Motion to Modify Order
&
Declaration #13 |
|
| |
|
|
| August, 2007 |
USDC DECISION &
ORDER Denying Motion to Modify (Denied
without explanation) |
|
| |
|
|
| August 30, 2007 |
WTP EMERGENCY Motion to Stay Order Pending Appeal to 2nd Circuit US Court of
Appeals |
|
| |
|
|
| August 30, 2007 |
US COURT OF APPEALS ORDER, Partially
Granting WTP Emergency Appeal |
|
| |
Text of Order:
Before: Hon. Peter W.
Hall, Circuit Judge
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED
only as to paragraph c of
the District Court's Order (requiring production
of "identification
information" etc. for the United States); deny
as to remainder of District
Court's Order. The entire motion for a stay is
referred to the next
available motions panel.
FOR THE COURT:
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE, Clerk
|
|
| |
Note: US COA 3-Judge panel to fully
consider WTP's Emergency Appeal on or before
Sept. 18th |
|
| |
|
|
| August 31, 2007 |
US COURT OF APPEALS ORDER, for Oral
Arguments on Sept. 18th and DOJ response ASAP |
|
| |
Text of Order:
Motion for stay of injunctive
order and to
expedite the appeal has been added to the
substantive motions calendar for September
18, 2007**TO BE ARGUED**; any responsive
papers to calendar ASAP. [Entry date Aug
31 2007] [JC]
|
|
| |
|
|
| Sept. 2007 |
DOJ Response opposing WTP Motion to Stay
|
|
| |
|
|
| Sept. 2007 |
WTP Reply to DOJ Response |
|
| |
|
|
| Sept 18, 2007 |
AUDIO file
of Oral Arguments (on Motion to Stay) at U.S. Court of Appeals
RIGHT-click
here.
(3.9 MB, .wma) |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sept. 20, 2007 |
US COURT OF
APPEALS ORDER extends stay of full
injunction enforcement pending full appeal |
|
| |
|
|
| Oct.
22, 2007 |
WTP Full Appeal
to 2nd Circuit COA |
|
| |
|
|
| Nov., 2007 |
DOJ Response to WTP Appeal |
|
| |
|
|
| Dec.
6, 2007 |
WTP
Reply Brief |
|
| |
|
|
| Feb.
4, 2008 |
TRANSCRIPT: Oral Arguments at
2nd. Circuit Court of Appeals |
|
| |
|
|
|
Feb. 8, 2008 |
Decision
& Order of 2nd Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals |
|
| |
|
|
|
April 7, 2008 |
Petition for En Banc Rehearing to 2nd
Circuit Court of Appeals |
|
| |
|
|
| |
2nd Circuit En Banc
Decision upholds District Court Order. (document
not currently available) |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sept. 4, 2008 |
Schulz & WTP appeal to U.S. Supreme Court:
Petition for Writ of Certiorari
and
Appendix |
|
| |
|
|
| |
U.S. Supreme
Court DENIES Schulz/WTP appeal. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
FINAL NOTE: The decision and Order against
Schulz/WTP was transacted and upheld by every
appellate court without any adversarial public
hearing, without any opportunity to confront
witnesses, and without ANY PUBLIC TRIAL. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
